In 2007, the New York Times featured a demolition of what's known as molecular diagnostic testing . It was about the impossibility of achieving reliable results from PCR.
It seems that a New Hampshire hospital suffered an outbreak of colds and flu. But PCR testing "identified" a deadly virus. It took eight months, hysterical panic, development of a vaccine and massive lockdown isolation within the hospital before somebody woke up to the fact that the PCR "positives" were, um....ordinary viruses.
In 2020, this exact same PCR test is that used in the diagnosis of COVID-19's presence in the body.
Why is this? Two reasons:
1. As PCR almost always produces falsity to the positive side, it keeps the "case" numbers up, which is exactly what the Pharmafia wants; and
2. The threshhold for confirming the Covid19 diagnosis has been lowered. By the CDC in the US, and others who for the sake of argument we might call Anthony Fauci.
In many cases, those now being called positive for C19 may have natural traces of it but they are not contagious as individuals. Frontline workers are, not surprisingly, worried about what appears to be fiddling the threshhold in order to convince State doubters and thus act as a catalyst for panicky lockdowns.
The key players in this drama - Neil Ferguson, Anthony Fauci, Peter Horby and many others - have all been outed as incompetent, mendacious, murderous and heavily pharma-funded "experts".
But the bulldozer rumbles on, flattening any and all protest.
This morning in the UK, troops are out on the streets of Liverpool (see below)....using this doctored PCR test to identify levels of contagion.
Their equipment is unfit for purpose....unless the purpose, of course, is simply to keep the fear-factor ramped up.